Holmes, according to the prosecutors’ July 31 response to Holmes’ July 30 motion, is adopting a strategy of other defendants indicted during the COVID-19 pandemic — to suggest without basis that was the grand jury that returned second and third superseding indictments against her was not selected at random from a fair cross-section of the community.
“Defendant Holmes is not entitled under the [Jury Selection and Service Act] to the majority of the materials she seeks because such materials are not necessary to allow her to assess whether to move to stay proceedings or dismiss the indictment. …