In a filing yesterday, Holmes’ lawyers claim that in the absence of information in the Laboratory Information System (LIS) database, the judge should not allow jurors to hear anecdotal stories from medical professionals and the general public about erroneous Theranos test results.
“The reason that the government has built its case on this teetering card house of irrelevant evidence is that it lost — or, worse, did not want to analyze preindictment — the actual evidence of testing results in this case,” Holmes’ lawyers said.
Prosecutors have claimed that Therano…